So-Called Racial Discrimination in America
by Larry McCart
|
More than ten thousand years ago there was a great migration of humans from Asia and Europe to America. This was a period that was close to the end of the last Ice Age, and this migration took place over a period of about 500 years according to some historians. The route to American was an ice bridge or possibly a land bridge between what is now Siberia and Alaska. During the period of this migration probably more than 10,000 humans came to America, and many of them were White. Some of these people continued traveling into what is now Central America and northern South America. As they continued traveling farther into South America, the weather became colder and colder as they approached what is now southern Argentina, and very few continued to travel south. Southern Argentina is populated by few humans even though the weather is similar to northern Germany, and natural resources are abundant. Over thousands of years the humans of America changed in appearance, especially in the warmer climates where skin was easily sunburned. The humans who did best and who had the most children were the humans who could best resist injury caused by exposure to the sun, and gradually over the centuries humans in these hot areas with European-like white skin became uncommon. Many of the humans in these hot areas are today seen as brown-skin persons, but they also are descendants of White People who evolved into brown-skin people. In the area that is now the northern United States white skin was common even after humans had been there about 10,000 years. Even though they looked like European White People, they were heathens, and they often behaved like heathens. After about 200 years of training in Bible Truth, these White People became acceptable for socializing with Bible people who had come over from Europe beginning about 1,500 A.D. Only after these heathen White People had given up their tribal pagan doctrines and had replaced these pagan doctrines with Bible Truth did they become socially acceptable to Bible people. This took about six generations with the majority of these heathen White People. The key issue here is doctrine and not "race" or "skin color". The Bible tells us that there is one race -- the Human race. Whether or not a person has the "preferred skin color" is relative to the climate where the person lives. Jesus (30 A.D.) gave us the Hebrew Bible, and Jesus was Brown, similar to many Hispanics in Mexico and Central America. Athanasius (367 A.D.) gave us the New Testament, and Athanasius was Black. These men had the "preferred skin color" relative to the climates where they lived. Jesus lived in an area close to Iraq, and Athanasius lived in Egypt. Both of these men would be socially acceptable to Bible people in America because of doctrine, just as other Browns and Blacks are socially acceptable to Bible people in America if they believe in and obey the Bible. Because of the success of the Devil in getting sons and daughters of some White People in America to replace Bible Truth with some Devil doctrine, there are people in America who look White but are not socially acceptable to Bible people. These creatures who look White have become like White heathens of past centuries. Discrimination is good if based on Bible Truth. Bible people have permission from the Lord to discriminate against heathen sinners. The Hebrew Bible and the New Testament were not developed by White People. Ancient Hebrews had Brown skin, and many early supporters of New Testament doctrine were Black. White People from Grecian and Roman civilizations had their own pagan religions, and did not take Bible Truth seriously until the time of Jesus. Not until about 350 A.D. did the doctrine of the Hebrew Bible become the "doctrine of choice" among European White People. Why did White People not discover Bible Truth sooner? To answer this question, we should first study theories as to where White People came from. When Jehovah created Adam, the only human on the face of Planet Earth was of color -- probably similar to humans who live in Central America. As humans increased in number through the early centuries of the human race, some of the children of these early humans had lighter than normal skin. In ancient times hunting and farming were the primary occupations, and humans with darker skin color did better because they could survive better working out in the sun. The humans with lighter skin could not produce as much, and could only hope to be among the best if they moved north up into less desirable parts of the world where the sun was not such a problem. As the centuries went by and as some of these humans continued to move farther and farther north into even less desirable parts of the world, the White People came into existence. The farther up north they were and the worse the climate, the easier it was for White People to be as good as people of color. People of color preferred the more desirable parts of the world, and the ones who were born of color from White parents often moved down south into the beautiful areas of the world. After many centuries, about the only humans way up north were White People. These White People were so far away from areas of the world where Bible culture developed that they largely lost contact with the Bible way of life of their ancient ancestors who were of color. As communication with other parts of the world improved, and as travel to other parts of the world became easier, the White People re-discovered the superior way of life of their ancient ancestors who were of color -- the Bible way of life. How did the cold winters way up north affect the behavior of people? According to Professor Richard Lynn, one result of the cold winters was an increase in intelligence as measured by IQ tests. To be prosperous in areas that have cold winters requires a higher level of intelligence compared to the level of intelligence needed to be prosperous in tropical climates -- resulting in persons way up north with higher IQ's having many children, and person's way up north with lower IQ's having few children. Based on studies cited by Professor Lynn, Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans have the highest IQ scores -- a mean value of 105; other IQ scores: European (100), Eskimo (91), Southeast Asian (87), American native Indian (87), Pacific Ocean islands indigenous inhabitant (85), Indian and North Africa (84), Sahara Africans (67), Australian original people (62). The average IQ is 54 for persons in the South African desert plateau jungle and for persons in the Congo rain forest area. Professor Richard Lynn's 2002 book IQ and the Wealth of Nations has the average IQ for each climate as follows (based on an average IQ of 100 for the United Kingdom). Hong Kong 107 An adult with an IQ over 130 is considered to be mentally gifted; an adult with an IQ less than 70 is considered to be mentally retarded. James Flynn, political scientist from New Zealand, has reported "massive gains" in IQ in the United States of America. When IQ tests are standardized, people consistently find earlier versions of the tests easier, and score higher than the original test-takers. According to James Flynn, the U.S. population has gained three IQ points per decade since 1932. Professor Richard Lynn believes the gains are real, and probably are due to better nutrition, also thought to be the cause of comparable increases in stature. According to James Flynn, the average IQ in the United States of America has increased about 20 points since 1932. In 1932 the average IQ in the US was about 78 (based on an average IQ of 100 for the United Kingdom in 2002). This has important implications regarding the political situation. A US population with an average IQ of 78 would be stupid enough to believe propaganda lies and to accept political institutions (such as military slavery) that a US population with an average IQ of 98 would reject. It has been suggested that enemies of Freedom have worked in the direction of reducing the average IQ in the US. An example of this would be giving low-IQ welfare people financial incentives to produce low-IQ children; in the US the more children low-IQ welfare people produce, the higher their welfare payments. Low-IQ welfare people are given free access to medical services relating to having children that many higher-IQ persons can not afford. Professor Richard Lynn graduated in Psychology and took his Ph.D. at the University of Cambridge. He has been lecturer in Psychology at the University of Exeter, professor of Psychology at the Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland, and professor and head of the department of Psychology at the University of Ulster. |