Making a Prototype Motor

 

Below are pictures and descriptions regarding Larry McCart's research and development center in Bakersfield, California, USA.  Located in central Bakersfield in one of the best areas of town, there are three buildings with a total of 24,000 square feet of floor space, and two parking lots.  Larry owns the real estate and all the equipment, and everything is paid off.  Starting with a small welding business in 1978, Larry has become a multi-millionaire with his own manufacturing company, the number one producer in the United States of top lock oil well pump rings.

Larry is 66 years old, and has been taking deprenyl for over 20 years, and also takes TA-65 and other telomerase activators (also 400 mg of CoQ10 per day and resveratrol) and feels and works like a person about 30 years old.  He expects to be a healthy and productive worker for hundreds of years, and is looking forward to the celebration of his birthday when he is 1000 years old.

Unlike most welders or machinists who are successful with their businesses, and then hire others to do the high skill work, for over 25 years Larry has continued to do regular welding work out in the shop, and for over 25 years has done all the programming and set-up work on his CNC lathes.  Larry also is a self-educated mechanical engineer.  Larry is well qualified to develop gravity-related technology that will make possible a better way of life for those who live on Planet Earth.

Larry believes that a motor that produces dynamic force as a result of the use of a static force can be designed in such a way that there is not a problem regarding zero point energy, and that such a motor would be free of risks that a "free energy" device would have that produces dynamic force as a result of manipulation of zero point energy (ZPE).

Larry believes the development of useful gravity motors will lead to the development of motors that produce dynamic force as a result of the use of other types of static force.  If a motor can produce dynamic force as a result of the use of a static force such as gravity, Larry believes that a motor can be built that can produce dynamic force as a result of the use of another type of static force such as the static force caused by a spring that stays stretched or compressed.  Such a motor will not need gravity, and could be used for an "endless supply of motive force" that could be used for space travel.  Larry calls this type of motor a gravity-effect motor.  A large gravity-effect motor could be used to power a high-rpm rotational machine with anti-gravity geometry.  Such a machine would be much less costly and much safer for space travel compared to highly wasteful and dangerous space vehicles currently used.

A rotational machine with anti-gravity geometry could take off from Planet Earth going straight up, accelerating with not more than a 3-G force on the occupants.  Since the power produced by the gravity-effect motor can continue for years, a proper rotational speed can be maintained for an anti-gravity force that would keep the machine at the specified altitude.

If one were actually going to the Moon in a space vehicle, the ascent should be straight up from the South Pole area of Planet Earth in order to avoid dangerous Van Allen belt radiation.  One internet website claims that the Japanese have used radar to track space vehicles coming straight down

from space in the South Pole area of Planet Earth.  A private German organization, according to some internet websites, has a base for anti-gravity rotational machines in the South Pole area.

Larry has received information indicating that at least one private German organization (independent of the German government) has had anti-gravity rotational machines since the 1920's.  For political reasons, information about such machines is restricted.  The so-called "flying saucers" frequently seen in the air in South America are actually German machines, some of them possibly built during the 1920's and 1930's.  Based on a report, at least one private German organization has had bases on the Moon since the 1950's or before.  Based on what Larry knows, the machines these people have are more advanced than current-day US federal government secret machines.  

   

A picture from abovetopsecret.com of a UFO in the air (probably a late-model German anti-gravity rotational machine); the UFO seems to have anti-gravity geometry and the shape required for a gravity-effect motor, with a sharp leading edge for rapid side-ways movement in atmosphere.  When traveling in outer space, it seems the passenger cabin rotates causing ideal gravity for human passengers.

What is perceived as the top in the picture seems to be the front of the spacecraft when traveling in outer space.  It seems the dome shape at the top in the picture is a cover over a very powerful particle beam device designed to blast apart potentially dangerous objects in an outer-space flight path -- perhaps even a rock 100 feet in diameter.

One of the main requirements for safe trips in outer space is the ability to blast apart potentially dangerous objects in an outer-space flight path.  The US federal government apparently does not have access to technology for building equipment for blasting apart potentially dangerous objects in an outer-space flight path, and should not send humans on trips in outer space.  There are thousands of rocks and other pieces of space junk in outer space, and a collision with one of these objects could destroy a spacecraft.

Larry's next-door neighbor in the 1950's and 1960's was an SS Officer in National Socialist Germany during World War Two, and his son and daughter were about Larry's age, and were some of Larry's favorite friends.  Larry was not able to find out about secret German projects when talking to his German neighbors.  The SS Officer said he was in a different department.

According to Joseph P. Farrell (author of the book SS Brotherhood of the Bell) there was only one German research project at the highest secrecy level (what the Germans called "war decisive") and that was the "Bell Project" that possibly related to the power system for particle beam weapons and motors in later-model anti-gravity rotational machines ("flying saucers").  This fits, since anti-gravity rotational machines armed with particle beam weapons are the main reason Germany won World War Two.

Because of what seemed to be the development of a new super power system relating to the "Bell Project", it seems electro-magnet motors were used in later-model anti-gravity rotational machines.  Anti-gravity rotational machines developed by Germans during the 1920's and 1930's probably were powered by permanent magnet motors.

 

After years of research at the Lawrence D. McCart Research and Development Center in Bakersfield, California, Larry believes that he and his assistants are going in the right direction for developing designs for magnet motors that will work without repelling magnetic forces (free-energy magnet motors that do not require a connection to an electric utility company).  As of March 1, 2010, every prototype of a permanent magnet motor we made did not work.

A permanent magnet motor (as designed by Larry and not involving repelling magnetic forces) changes static force caused by permanent magnets to dynamic force.  Power is not created.  Energy is not created.  Static force caused by magnets is changed to dynamic force because of the pull of moving magnets on stationary curved steel.  A permanent magnet motor can be thought of as a converter that changes static force to dynamic force.

 

 

Hypothesis (5-24-2010)

Magnet Motor

The small 35T gear is stationary, and the large 140T gears move.  There are four arms sticking out from the center support of each 140T gear.  The 140T gear rotates 1/4 turn when the 140T gear goes 360 degrees around the 35T gear (1/8 turn when the 140T gear goes 180 degrees around the 35T gear).

This magnet motor (if it worked) probably would work best in the horizontal or flat position in order to neutralize the effect of gravity caused by Planet Earth.

Since there are not any repelling magnetic forces against the magnets, the millions of domains within the magnets stay lined up, and the magnets seemingly do not lose pulling force over time.  If the motor worked, it seems this motor would be close to being a perpetual motion device since it seems the device could run for years and continue to put out as much rotational force as when the device was first used.

It has been reported that a number of magnet motors have been built that "work".  As far as Larry knows, all of these magnet motors use repelling magnetic forces to cause rotation.  Repelling magnetic forces against a magnet cause the magnetic pull of the magnet to be reduced, and the more the magnet motor is used, the weaker the magnet motor becomes.  With Larry's design it seems the magnet motor does not become weaker over time.

A South American inventor who in 1990 patented a magnet motor design (based on repelling magnetic forces) went on to other things because he was discouraged by the degaussing of the expensive magnets he used with his prototype.  Degauss means:  To reduce the magnetic pulling force of a magnet.  Degaussing happens when a magnet is exposed to strong repelling magnetic forces.

 


South American magnet motor patent awarded in 1990

 

Because Larry's magnet motor does not involve repelling magnetic forces, inexpensive ceramic magnets should work.  This is important, since about 90% of known deposits of materials used in the production of neodymium magnets are in China, and the Chinese government could limit or cut off delivery of these materials to foreign nations.

Regarding hypothesis 5-24-2010, two large magnet motors could be used to power a high-rpm rotational machine with anti-gravity geometry.  Such a machine would be much less costly and much safer than highly wasteful and dangerous fuel-using aircraft and spacecraft currently used.

If power systems based on hypothesis 5-24-2010 were used in an anti-gravity rotational machine ("flying saucer") there should be two separate power systems, one rotating clockwise and the other rotating counter-clockwise.  One of the power systems should be above the passenger cabin, and the other power system should be below the passenger cabin.  The operation of the two power systems should be coordinated so that clockwise torque caused by one of the power systems is counter-balanced by counter-clockwise torque caused by the other power system.  The top of the "flying saucer" would have geometry making possible an up-force that would vary based on RPM, and the top of the "flying saucer" would spin clockwise.  The bottom of the "flying saucer" would have geometry making possible a down-force that would vary based on RPM, and the bottom of the "flying saucer" would spin counter-clockwise.  A slight tilt forward with more up-force than down-force would result in smooth and rapid acceleration in the tilt direction.  Computer technology readily available in the US is good enough so that a guidance system can be built to safely operate one of these machines.  The "flying saucer" would be stable and would have a smooth ride even in weather that would cause a bumpy ride in an old-fashion winged airplane such as those used during the previous century.  Hopefully, most of those loud, bumpy, polluting, and fuel-using airplanes will be replaced by safe and smooth-riding magnet-motor-powered rotational machines by 2020.

 

Click here for page one

Click here for recording of Larry talking