Did astronauts from the United States of America really set foot on the Moon in 1969?  Were the photographs that astounded an entire generation real?  There are a growing number of people who are beginning to doubt what many people once considered fact.  Some people believe it would have been impossible to safely land astronauts on the moon in 1969, because of radiation, solar flares and other conditions.  Others believe that if astronauts did go to the Moon during the Apollo missions, the films of astronauts "on the Moon" actually were films of astronauts on Earth. 

Why would the federal government fake such an event?  The central icon of the new communist State religion created by the mass media after the fake Presidential assassination in November 1963 was John Kennedy, an irresponsible doper who frequently committed the crime of adultery.  He was held in contempt by many Americans, and likely would have dragged his political party down to disastrous defeat at the next election in November 1964.  Many loyal Americans believed that John Kennedy was a communist.  These same loyal Americans believed that Vice President Lyndon Johnson was a more dangerous communist than Kennedy, and they were concerned that Lyndon Johnson would become President because of Kennedy's health problems.  If Kennedy died of Addison's disease during October 1963, there was a cover-up regarding the time and cause of Kennedy's death, and a show was arranged for November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas, to make conservative political opponents look bad and to make Kennedy look like some kind of great hero, so Lyndon Johnson would have a better chance of winning the 1964 Presidential election.  By summer 1964 the mass media had created a Kennedy myth that was accepted as real by the American masses, and this myth helped Lyndon Johnson win the 1964 Presidential election. 

Some of the communist garbage spewed out during one of John Kennedy's speeches was that the communist federal government was so great and so brilliant that they would land American astronauts on the Moon by the end of the decade.  Many Americans believed this communist lie, and did not seem upset as huge amounts of the nation's wealth were transferred to aero-space companies -- a major source of funds used by communist politicians to win elections -- for work and equipment that the federal government knew would be completely useless for achieving a successful moon landing by astronauts.

The Apollo One fire of January 27, 1967, killed what mass media propaganda said would have been the first crew to walk on the Moon.  Gus Grissom, one of the astronauts killed, a few days before the fire, publicly stated that he believed it would take at least another ten years to develop the technology to achieve a successful Moon Landing of astronauts on the Moon.  The New York Times newspaper editorialized in March 1967, "We fail to see that it makes any great difference who reaches the moon first or whether the landing takes place in the 1960's or mid-1970's."

The federal government seemed determined to fool the American masses into believing that a successful moon landing occurred in 1969.  The federal government (working with their friends in the mass media) had been successful at getting the masses to believe the lie that a U.S. President was assassinated in 1963, and apparently thought they could get the masses to believe a lie that astronauts landed on the moon in 1969. 

A picture that mass media propaganda said was taken when Apollo 11 was 30,000 miles away from Planet Earth seems to be a fake.  It seems strange that Buzz Aldrin would film Planet Earth when he was standing far away from the window.  Normally a photographer would get close to the window to get the best picture, and also to eliminate light reflections.  We saw the window frame come into view on the left side of the picture.  The camera isn't set to infinity since the window frame is not out of focus.  Did Buzz Aldrin film the round window in such a way that it would appear to be the round shape of Planet Earth?  Apollo 11 at this point in the mission supposedly was half way to the Moon.  The time elapsed was 34 hours and 16 minutes.  Based on a careful study of the portion of Planet Earth seen through the round window, it appears that they were not in deep space at all, but in low Planet Earth orbit! 

There should be cross hairs present on pictures taken by astronauts.  The system for adding crosshairs to the pictures was built into the camera, and therefore crosshairs should be visible on every picture taken by the astronauts during the mission.  The crosshairs are there to help calculate distances.  In the official NASA moon photographs there are crosshairs on photographs appearing to be behind objects, as if the objects had been pasted into the pictures.  In some pictures parts of the crosshairs have disappeared.  The crosshairs should be visible on all the pictures, and not hidden behind objects in the pictures.

If you look closely at one of the pictures, you will notice that the rock appears to have a letter C on it.  There is also a C on the ground in front of the rock.  The use of the letter C on film props is well known by the people in Hollywood and is used to show where the center of the scene should be. 

One of the biggest anomalies shown in the Moon pictures is the way shadows seem to be cast in totally different directions, even when the objects making the shadows are a mere few feet apart.  In other pictures, one astronaut's shadow appears to be taller than the shadow of his companion.  This could be because he is standing closer to an artificial light that is illuminating them both.  NASA officials have said that artificial lighting was not used, but this does not seem to be true when the evidence is viewed.  One picture seems to show that Aldrin is being artificially lit as he descends the ladder.  The reflectivity of the Lunar surface is so low that light does not even reflect on the rocks that are on the ground, yet the light in these pictures is so intense that Aldrin's heel protector on his boot is well lighted. 

A newspaper report said that some residents of Australia saw a different broadcast of the Moon Landing than the rest of the World.  According to this newspaper report, just before Neil Armstrong steps onto the Moon's surface, the picture goes from a stark black to a brighter picture; as television viewers watched Armstrong supposedly walking on the surface of the Moon, they spotted a Coke bottle on the right hand side of the picture; the next day the footage seemed to be edited, and the Coke bottle part of the film was not there.  Some viewers claim they had seen the Coke bottle, and several articles about this appeared in the newspaper West Australian.  Western Australia received their coverage in a different way than the rest of the World, and this was the only area where there was not a delay in the so-called live transmission. 

There should have been some type of crater under an Apollo landing module, especially the Apollo 12 landing module as it seemed to slowly move across the moon's surface before landing.  Why was there not any dust on the landing pads?  There is a lot of dust scattered when the landing module appears to be leaving the Moon.  If the engine blew all the dust away from around the landing module as it landed, how did Armstrong manage to create that famous footprint? 

If this footage were not taken on the Moon, how do you explain the astronauts being able to bounce around on the surface?  How would you reproduce the effects of the lighter gravity of the Moon during filming on Earth?  If you double the speed of the film, you would see that the astronauts move like they were on Earth.  Instead of the film showing a jump at least four feet high in one-sixth gravity where a 150 pound man would weigh 25 pounds, the highest jump in the film was about nineteen inches, about what a jump would be on Earth. 

Radiation plays a big part in space travel.  Solar flares could have affected the astronauts at any time.  When doctors take X-rays they either leave the room or stand behind a sheet of thick lead to shelter them from the radiation.  Why did NASA only use a small sheet of aluminum to protect the astronauts when they knew that the radiation levels in Space and on the Moon's surface would be many hundreds of times more deadly? 

One of the worst solar flares ever recorded happened in August 1972, which was between the Apollo 16 and 17 missions.  This single flare would have delivered instant death to any astronaut in Space, and all of the Apollo astronauts were carrying out their missions in what amounts to nothing more than a thick linen suit.  These pressure suits may have helped protect the astronauts against heat, but certainly would not have given any radiation protection. 

The radiation would have greatly affected the film that was shot on the Moon.  The camera films were changed while the astronauts were outside. 

Another problem with the Moon pictures is that the same mountains appear on different Apollo missions that are supposed to be several hundred miles apart. 

Footprints are the result of weight displacing air or moisture from between particles of dirt, dust, or sand.  The astronauts left distinct footprints all over the place. 

How did the fiberglass whip antenna on the Gemini 6A capsule survive the tremendous heat of atmospheric re-entry? 

The fabric space suits had a large zipper.  There should have been fast leakage of air since even a pinhole deflates a tire in short order. The astronauts in these "pressurized" suits were easily able to bend their fingers, wrists, elbows, and knees supposedly at 5.2 psi.  The guys would have looked like balloon men if the suits had been pressurized at 5.2 psi in a vacuum.  During the Apollo 14 flag display, the flag would not stop fluttering even though there is not any air on the moon. 

How did a camera pan upward to track the departure of the Apollo 16 module if there was not a cameraman there to operate it? 

If the federal government were successful at landing astronauts on the Moon during the Apollo project in 1969, why have astronauts not gone back?  In 1987, when President Reagan enforced a policy of truth and honesty regarding federal government employees, NASA officials said they probably could land men on the Moon by 2010 -- twenty-three years from 1987.  According to mass media propaganda, a Moon Landing by astronauts occurred in 1969, and, according to mass media propaganda, development of the technology to do this took eight years from the start of the Apollo project in 1961.  If technology for achieving a safe Moon Landing by astronauts had been developed by 1969, why could this technology not be used now?  The answer to this question is that such technology never existed.

On September 6, 2005, Neil Armstrong said setting foot on the moon was "a wonderful feeling" -- especially because he'd thought the landing had only a 50 percent chance of a success.  "I was elated, ecstatic and extremely surprised that we were successful," Armstrong said. (Science and Space, CNN, September 6, 2005)